cornerofmadness (
cornerofmadness) wrote2014-06-22 02:13 pm
Entry tags:
Writerly Ways
Before I get into it, I wish one of the authors on my group had linked to the article (or was it a class, it wasn't clear) But not only are epithets on the outs. So are adjectives.The new rule, verbs and nouns only to keep sentences simple. Apparently we now have to dumb down writing to Run Dick Run levels to make it manageable for people with cognitive damage from facebook and twitter. I think I'll pass on that until the editors insist. I don't want to write like Hemmingway. His prose was dull and boring and I'm not sure how he ever ascended to where he did. Venting over.
What I wanted to talk about is sequels and series. Technically my Soldiers of the Sun is part of a series. I definitely want to do a sequel to Kept Tears Heck, the reviewers want me to do a sequel. I had so much fun with Triskelion and Nothing But Himself (both out soon) that I wanted to write more in those universes. Even as I work on Behind Blue Eues, I know it's a min. duology if not more.
I love series. I love come back to characters and settings again and again. Yes, sometimes series get stale and you lose interest but that usually takes a while. Could you imagine Harry Potter as only one book? How about your favorite mystery series? Would Harry Dresden be so beloved if it was only one book? Graphic Novels and manga would be totally different medias without a series.
And yet I'm seeing tihs a lot both on goodreads and elsewhere, a push back against a series. I didn't realize there was a sizable faction who hate them. Now I do dislike a series/trilogy that doesn't have at least some subplots wrapped up by the end of the book. The biggest complaint, I see, however is that there is too long to wait. A year is too long and a lot of that is still coming from people who actually write. I'm stunned. They should know how hard it is to ready a GOOD novel. But more over is a year really that hard to wait? Have we gotten that demanding and self-centered that it all has to be 'now!' It's interesting to me. I find it vaguely disappointing.
How do you feel about series? Do you write them? Do you plan on them or do they just happen somewhere in the middle of book one? It's a little of both for me.
Yearly Word Count-
Soldiers of the Sun - editing
everything else I'm supposed to be doing I'm not.
What I wanted to talk about is sequels and series. Technically my Soldiers of the Sun is part of a series. I definitely want to do a sequel to Kept Tears Heck, the reviewers want me to do a sequel. I had so much fun with Triskelion and Nothing But Himself (both out soon) that I wanted to write more in those universes. Even as I work on Behind Blue Eues, I know it's a min. duology if not more.
I love series. I love come back to characters and settings again and again. Yes, sometimes series get stale and you lose interest but that usually takes a while. Could you imagine Harry Potter as only one book? How about your favorite mystery series? Would Harry Dresden be so beloved if it was only one book? Graphic Novels and manga would be totally different medias without a series.
And yet I'm seeing tihs a lot both on goodreads and elsewhere, a push back against a series. I didn't realize there was a sizable faction who hate them. Now I do dislike a series/trilogy that doesn't have at least some subplots wrapped up by the end of the book. The biggest complaint, I see, however is that there is too long to wait. A year is too long and a lot of that is still coming from people who actually write. I'm stunned. They should know how hard it is to ready a GOOD novel. But more over is a year really that hard to wait? Have we gotten that demanding and self-centered that it all has to be 'now!' It's interesting to me. I find it vaguely disappointing.
How do you feel about series? Do you write them? Do you plan on them or do they just happen somewhere in the middle of book one? It's a little of both for me.
Yearly Word Count-
Soldiers of the Sun - editing
everything else I'm supposed to be doing I'm not.
no subject
Well I can see your issue and that is a legimiate reason for maybe favoriting stand alones or trilogies to the long series (more so than I don't like to wait for it.) If you like mysteries, I wouldn't think that long series are a problem since they're essentially stand alones.
well that's cool about the OFC. Yeah I'll be honest more of my original stories fizzle than don't.
no subject
Yeah you've mentioned that. That's too bad.
no subject
I also don't mind series where you can pick up a book later in the series and not have to read everything up to it (looking at you, mysteries).
I like description. And some adverbs. And adjectives. And a lot of what they want to get rid of - but it does explain how I'm getting through really large books so fast - there's no description, paragraphs are only four or five lines long, and there are no identifiers in conversations any more. We won't go into how many novels I've read this year alone that are all 'present tense'.
no subject
Yes that is what I LOVE about mystery series. Yeah you do miss some things but for the most part, since they're stand alone, you're good.
Nope identifiers in conversation are going away. Pretty soon my talking head first drafts will be perfect. head desk.
no subject
UGH.
Watch me read more and more fanfic.
:\
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
Now each of these treated its individual books differently. Otherland was essentially a four-part novel rather than a series. Redwall had interconnected stories set in the same location, sometime generations apart. The Young Wizard books were more or less self-contained (although references, of course) but they've lately become more interconnected. The same could be said for the Dresden books, which were more episodic until the Vampire war began, and then they were pretty serial. (Of course, the one book to end on a cliffhanger, "Changes," was the one I caught up on the series with.) And Harry Potter has each book set around a year in school, each one telling its own story while advance the larger one.
With the exception of Otherland, each book in the other series felt like whole and complete books, even if they were on a large level a chapter in a larger story. As long as they don't feel like only a chapter, then a series is perfectly fine with me.
It's what happens with a lot of movies where they film the two sequels together. Any other complaints aside, The Matrix Reloaded is simply not a complete movie without The Matrix Revolutions. The same could be said for Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Man's Chest isn't complete without At World's End.
The Dark Knight, however, is a complete film with our without The Dark Knight Rises.
To anyone who doesn't like series, I'd just say don't read them and leave them to those who do. And if they don't like that, they can bugger off.
no subject
I never thought about it that was with the Matrix but you're right and that's the kind of thing I don't like in book series. It should have some kind of finish to the story, like each HP book. I don't like it when book 2's ending is in book 3