Writerly Ways
Jun. 12th, 2011 10:17 amwell since I hadn't had one in two weeks and with the surgery tomorrow, I'm not sure if I'll be able to do any in the near future I thought I'd better tuck one in here.
You've already heard this week's big news about Ghost of Jupiter selling.
As for the writers' group stuff I talked about a couple weeks ago, needless to say I still want to do it but I also will need a few weeks probably to get myself ready for it. Maybe in July. Sorry about that guys.
I have several original fiction projects in mind.
I started Scott Westerfield's Leviathian. Several people recced it as good steampunk but I had been shying away for one reason, I am so tired of the girl dressing as a boy trope. While I know that there have been real world cases of girls dressing as boys (pirates, stagecoach drivers, even Calamity Jane was thought to be male foryears), I just have to wonder how the hell they pull it off. I'm not talking about the boobs. In thirty years, it's a rare occasion when there isn't an accident during my period. Either I'm extremely unlucky (hush it) or these dress as boy girls are lucky (or even a bit odd physiologically, which has been the case that some of them have been intersexed). I'm thinking even with pads that glue to the panties and/or tampons, versus something like rags wadded up/tied down that would have been the available protection in these stories days, this is dicey.
ELD reminded me that periods don't seem to exist in the written world unless it's a plot point.
Anyhow what is the point of period babbling? I was just thinking (since I'm not mentally up for serious writing talk). I'm curious just what tropes you're tired of seeing.
1. girls dressing as boys. I guess I just rather read stories where girls don't have to hide
2. the snarky assed heroine. Okay i like a little bit of snark and it was fun with Buffy and most of my heroines are snarky too but I'm talking about the ones who every word out of her mouth, every thought, is some snarky bullshit. A little snark is good. 300 pages is wearying.
3. zombies. I know I know someone who writes vampires doesn't get to talk about the overuse of zombies. I guess i just don't get why they're the hot new thing.
4. dystopias. I should just avoid them or learn to write them. I like angst right? I should love dystopias. I guess deep down I want happiness in my reading
I'm sure the list could be longer but I have to go get mom so i'll leave you with my yearly word count
36292 / 125000 words. 29% done!
You've already heard this week's big news about Ghost of Jupiter selling.
As for the writers' group stuff I talked about a couple weeks ago, needless to say I still want to do it but I also will need a few weeks probably to get myself ready for it. Maybe in July. Sorry about that guys.
I have several original fiction projects in mind.
I started Scott Westerfield's Leviathian. Several people recced it as good steampunk but I had been shying away for one reason, I am so tired of the girl dressing as a boy trope. While I know that there have been real world cases of girls dressing as boys (pirates, stagecoach drivers, even Calamity Jane was thought to be male foryears), I just have to wonder how the hell they pull it off. I'm not talking about the boobs. In thirty years, it's a rare occasion when there isn't an accident during my period. Either I'm extremely unlucky (hush it) or these dress as boy girls are lucky (or even a bit odd physiologically, which has been the case that some of them have been intersexed). I'm thinking even with pads that glue to the panties and/or tampons, versus something like rags wadded up/tied down that would have been the available protection in these stories days, this is dicey.
ELD reminded me that periods don't seem to exist in the written world unless it's a plot point.
Anyhow what is the point of period babbling? I was just thinking (since I'm not mentally up for serious writing talk). I'm curious just what tropes you're tired of seeing.
1. girls dressing as boys. I guess I just rather read stories where girls don't have to hide
2. the snarky assed heroine. Okay i like a little bit of snark and it was fun with Buffy and most of my heroines are snarky too but I'm talking about the ones who every word out of her mouth, every thought, is some snarky bullshit. A little snark is good. 300 pages is wearying.
3. zombies. I know I know someone who writes vampires doesn't get to talk about the overuse of zombies. I guess i just don't get why they're the hot new thing.
4. dystopias. I should just avoid them or learn to write them. I like angst right? I should love dystopias. I guess deep down I want happiness in my reading
I'm sure the list could be longer but I have to go get mom so i'll leave you with my yearly word count

no subject
Date: 2011-06-12 02:37 pm (UTC)Not that I read much fiction, but I really think snark is easily abused. Too much of it and a character comes across as an asshole. This makes it difficult to root/cheer for the character.
no subject
Date: 2011-06-12 03:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-06-12 05:03 pm (UTC)This is prevalent mostly in romance, but I've seen it elsewhere also: The half-overheard conversation that causes the eavesdropper to misunderstand something and causes great - and utterly unnecessary - angst and keeps the hero/heroine apart for the majority of the book. And as a subset of that trope, the believed lie. So very, very overused.
no subject
Date: 2011-06-12 09:07 pm (UTC)Re. girls dressing as boys - I think the period stuff would be an issue for lots of girls, but I do know women who have very light flow who could get away with that aspect of it. One of the cases I know best, James Barry, had a valet who he/she was apparently very emotionally close with, who likely knew his/her secret and may even have helped cover. It doesn't interest me so much as a 'spunky heroine' trope but I quite like it when (much, much more rarely) the hero is transgendered or a butch dyke and living as a man is an end in itself. Tipping the Velvet did that side of it quite well.
I agree about snarky heroines done badly. I think it can be one of those things like female characters who make a big point of how they can do kung fu but are never required to do it by the plot and have no other personality traits. In other words, an unimaginative way to make your girl character 'strong' and/or 'feisty'. Buffy had depth and humanity, that's what made her both an interesting character and a genuine hero.
I love dystopias (and I have a soft spot for 'kill 'em all' AU stories like Days of Future Past in X-Men or The Wish in Buffy) but I do find myself needing a note of hope somewhere. I'm always suspicious of the idea that pessimism is automatically more thoughtful than optimism.
no subject
Date: 2011-06-12 09:15 pm (UTC)well yes, you know if being 'male' and transgendered was the point, I think that could be very interesting. The I want to be a pilot/knight/you name it so I'll dress as a guy thing is so over done I'm just very tired of it. I've not read Tipping the Velvet but heard it was good.
You hit it with the snarky heroines (C J Cherryh was one of the earlier offenders. everyone was like oooo her females are so strong but to me they were bitchy. there's a difference)
I've found more and more as I get older I like dystopias more. maybe because the world around me is getting more dystopic
no subject
Date: 2011-06-12 09:21 pm (UTC)Yes, if your character is just snark on legs, the snark had better be hilarious and charming enough to make them a likeable anti-hero rather than just obnoxious.
I am shallower, I just like to see my favourite characters getting nuked once in a while. XD
no subject
Date: 2011-06-12 09:38 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-06-13 02:10 am (UTC)agreed
snort
no subject
Date: 2011-06-13 02:13 am (UTC)agreed about the snark
no subject
Date: 2011-06-13 03:36 am (UTC)I raged on zombies on my LJ a few days ago too! HAYTE them! SO much! In ALL forms! They are stoopid- and stupid because people try to put a scientific veneer on what is essentially bullshit.
no subject
Date: 2011-06-13 03:31 pm (UTC)But of course that would be a pretty perfect storm of factors to work out for it to work flawlessly. Or maybe they did have accidents and just covered them up.
no subject
Date: 2011-06-15 10:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-06-15 10:38 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-06-16 12:36 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-06-16 01:36 am (UTC)