Writerly Ways
Jun. 15th, 2014 03:23 pmI had a great Writerly Ways in mind. I've had it there for two weeks. Today it is gone. Seriously.
evil_little_dog remembers me talking about it but neither of us remember what it is. Sigh.
I did find out last night my prediction came true. Remember me saying sooner rather than later female authors of m/m fiction were going to be called misogynists? That came out yesterday, and from the reactions of the authors on my list, it used many quotes out of context. I'm sure there are some who do write the bitch wife/ex but I've yet to see it. I have seen readers who want no women and the authors trounce them for saying it. I'm not linking to it because it just pisses me off (I will send a link if someone wants to see it).
So in lieu of my beautifully constructed post on writing, let me do a quick poll. I was surprised a while back that one publishing house doesn't allow epithets. I know I talked about it at the time. You know what I mean, 'the detective', 'the blond,' 'his lover' etc etc. I do use them. I like the reminder of looks or occupation especially in a multi-character book. I think calling someone a lover adds more intimacy than just the name.
However, when someone else brought this up, several of the authors went off about how horrible they are (the epithets). So it got me thinking, what about if they are use in moderation? Personally I get bored if it's always pronouns and/or names. They claim that's invisible and the reader doesn't bog down on them. I disagree. I find it very noticable and distracting. How about you?
[Poll #1971876]
Yearly word count -
Soldiers of the Sun - Beating head against wall. Rewritting ch 16
Splinters of Silver - didn't touch
Yule - haven't written crap. sigh
I did find out last night my prediction came true. Remember me saying sooner rather than later female authors of m/m fiction were going to be called misogynists? That came out yesterday, and from the reactions of the authors on my list, it used many quotes out of context. I'm sure there are some who do write the bitch wife/ex but I've yet to see it. I have seen readers who want no women and the authors trounce them for saying it. I'm not linking to it because it just pisses me off (I will send a link if someone wants to see it).
So in lieu of my beautifully constructed post on writing, let me do a quick poll. I was surprised a while back that one publishing house doesn't allow epithets. I know I talked about it at the time. You know what I mean, 'the detective', 'the blond,' 'his lover' etc etc. I do use them. I like the reminder of looks or occupation especially in a multi-character book. I think calling someone a lover adds more intimacy than just the name.
However, when someone else brought this up, several of the authors went off about how horrible they are (the epithets). So it got me thinking, what about if they are use in moderation? Personally I get bored if it's always pronouns and/or names. They claim that's invisible and the reader doesn't bog down on them. I disagree. I find it very noticable and distracting. How about you?
[Poll #1971876]
Yearly word count -
Soldiers of the Sun - Beating head against wall. Rewritting ch 16
Splinters of Silver - didn't touch
Yule - haven't written crap. sigh

no subject
Date: 2014-06-15 08:14 pm (UTC)And that's not even much of an exaggeration. Epithets can be useful in certain circumstances, but too many writers way, way, WAY over-use them.
no subject
Date: 2014-06-16 01:21 am (UTC)Unfortunately for me writing gay fiction I end up with an overuse of names because of pronoun confusion. An epithet can break that up some.
Thanks for chiming in.
no subject
Date: 2014-06-15 08:30 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-06-16 01:34 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-06-16 01:29 am (UTC)oh that just drives me nuts. They beg for us to write diversely but once we do they tell us how wrong we are to do it.
no subject
Date: 2014-06-16 04:41 am (UTC)/end rant. Sorry. This is my single biggest pet peeve at the moment.
no subject
Date: 2014-06-16 04:54 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-06-16 04:57 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-06-16 07:10 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-06-16 07:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-06-16 08:12 pm (UTC)Like, if the POV character is familiar with Roy, but the narration refers to him as "The Flame Alchemist" instead of "Roy/Mustang/Colonel/etc.", then I would expect Roy to be doing something in the scene that leads them to focus on that aspect - doing an impressive piece of alchemy? dutifully slipping into his Hero of Ishbal persona? or letting it slip at an unexpected moment?
In the context of a sex scene, if one partner is thinking of the other as "the detective", then I'd also ideally want something in the scene along the theme of investigating/uncovering what the other likes and how they work together.
But if they're just two dudes having coffee, I don't really care whose eyes are blue-er, unless the POV character has some in-story reason to be more invested in that descriptor than in names at that moments.
no subject
Date: 2014-06-16 08:19 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-06-16 09:08 pm (UTC)True, but I think I'd rather have that come out in something like:
"As Pedro recounted [charming first-date get-to-know-you story], Eric was struck again by the warmth in his brown eyes. He wondered if clients were as eager to spill their secrets to Dr. Flores as he was."
than by swapping in "the brown-eyed man" or "the therapist" for names/pronouns. Those details may belong in the scene, but when they're turned into an epithet - the single thing that identifies the character in that moment - they take on extra weight, and I think where epithets become unwieldy and distracting it's because the significance of that detail is out of proportion to whatever it is that's actually happening in the scene.
no subject
Date: 2014-06-16 10:36 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-06-17 06:53 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-06-17 06:56 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-06-23 12:56 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-06-23 01:52 am (UTC)