Angel Ficathon

[cornerofmadness]

Well this is the original deadline for the Antijoss's  Angel ficathon. I think it might be pushed back a week but theantijoss  said the masterlist would be up sometime today for those of us who got it done for the original date (which suited me better given my schedule. I wrote for itsabigrock  who wanted the following:

Pairing: Angelus/Darla (Angel/Spike is always fine too)

Genre You Prefer: I like Dark, Evil, well researched, Plot Driven, Smut is good, slash is good.

Requests: Any time before the soul, I have a carriage kink, lol.

Restrictions: No bashing of Drusilla, if you can't write her don't write her, just don't make her out to be an idiot, no babytalk, they're evil.

No problem. I do love writing historical fic though I'm not as good with Angelus as I am with Spike/Dru (as much as I adore Angelus I find him difficult to write, much more difficult than Spike for some reason).  I'm pretty happy with this story. It'll probably get more polishing before it hits my website so suggestions are welcome. It IS NC-17 (evil vampires here, rape, murder and mayhem are part and parcel). It's nearly 11,000 words long (sigh)

So without further ado here's Dance With the Devil in the Pale Moonlight (extra points to those who know which movie/character I stole the title from)

Comments

Re: When History Nerds Counter-Attack

[wackinessensues.livejournal.com]

I agree with you on many levels here and really brook no argument.

The biggest challenge with this ficathon was that there were authors coming from so many corners of fandom that very few had actually read each other's work or journals enough to know the styles, loves, etc. of those they were writing for. This is just one of the inherent downfalls to the ficathon process.

Historical fiction written from a twenty-first century perspective with modern jargon is not something I generally enjoy. It pulls the reader from the moment and I have a hard time getting back into the mood and feel after being jarred out. It's frightening the power a few words scattered here and there can have on a historical story. Luckily I think that like myself DM considers each piece a work in progress and always open to reworking, which means that as authors we can take all the comments into consideration and incorporating them into the piece.

Tobacco Lords (if one must define the man at all) would be more acceptable in the historical context.

As for what I had in mind the ficathon only gave a few things one could request so putting in exactly what sort of mood etc. wasn't really an option, such is life. DM was fair enough to warn she had struggles writing Angelus so it is through no fault of her own that she was asked to write him. I never meant to tear the story to shreds, it just didn't hit my buttons, I'm sure there are plenty of readers who will enjoy it I just couldn't get past the breaks in canon (because that's what I prefer) and using words like 'last squirts' of anything are the quickest way I've found yet to make me stop reading. I want to read it, I wouldn't even mind giving it a proper beta, but at this point I think we've established that there are many opinions and comments that will help her best decide how she wants to work her final edit. I'm just glad she was open to honest comments and hopefully she knows that it is in no way a critisism of her, just this one piece.

Re: When History Nerds Counter-Attack

[cornerofmadness.livejournal.com]

And I appreciate that. I think you actually have some of my stuff up at your site or did at one point. Though I'm still not sure where there were breaks in canon (beyond the name thing, and I'm confused, didn't you ask for Angel/Spike as an alternative? If I were a slasher you would have gotten something definitely not canon) and modern jargon, I know there is some but words like 'cute' actually aren't modern. It's use dates to the 1700's (I looked it up to be honest. 1730's to be precise and in a 100 years was common place. The F word believe it or not is all over 1700's court documents in the place of copulation just in case anyone cares to know that, I am a history nerd. about a third of all my fanfic is historical)

Like I said, you asked for evil vampires so I saw no reason to pretty them up. Darla/Angelus have always been shown as violent sexually especially toward each other.

Sorry that didn't work out for you but I'll confess to being a little put out by it. I don't think you intended to come across as a little rude but given the response here and privately,it was taken that way. But I'm okay with that since it'll hardly be the first or last time someone didn't like something I've written (you should see some of the comments I've received on my professional stuff). I don't think I'll be changing much in this story, quite frankly (beyond the expurgated version that will appear on FFN) since I think it's pretty true to the characters and the time period. And since it's not your type of story, I don't think some small amounts of fiddling with it would make it to your taste so that would just be an exercise in futility. Given that in ficathons you are lucky if you get 50% of your requests done another one in the loss column isn't that much of a difference.

Sorry it didn't work out better.

Re: When History Nerds Counter-Attack

[wackinessensues.livejournal.com]

I didn't mean to be rude, really. At least you made the effort, the last three ficathons I entered the person writing for me dropped off the planet and never even mentioned the words ficathon in their journals.

And you're right, a little tinkering may not make it my favorite piece ever, but I will give it another look none-the-less. I've archived your stories before and very well may want future stories to put beside them. I have stories of my own that I love and others I hate so I never give up on myself or others simply because of one story. I wish there was a magic way to make my words express what it as that my brain was thinking when I read it the first time, it just doesn't always want to cooperate.

I had a whole thing I started to say here, but I think I'm done, lol. I don't want to spam your LJ anymore with vague things that probably won't explain my vibe very well. I'm sorry.

Re: When History Nerds Counter-Attack

[cornerofmadness.livejournal.com]

Trust me, I do understand. LIke I said I didn't think your intent was to be rude (it was more the my friends didn't like it either comment). And like you I don't have the world's greatest success in getting a) a story written for me or b) getting feedback so negative feedback is fine by me, better than NOTHING which so many of us get. (we were just talking about this on a list I belong to). I'm hoping the turn out for my two ficathons goes better.

I'm okay with you not liking the story, really. There are things we read by our favorite authors out there and we sit and wonder what was that? And yeah, guess that's all that really needs to be said.

Re: When History Nerds Counter-Attack

[http://users.livejournal.com/_omega_man/]

I understand your objections.
I was merely suggesting that it would be more fair of you, as a critic and writer yourself, to perhaps cut the author "some slack":)
Especially given, as you say, the inherient limitations of a ficathon, your admitted unfamilarity with D.M Evan's work, plus the fact it is clearly a work in progress.

I also appreciate the thoughtful and civil nature of your reply and that you did take up my "gauntlet" to make a constructive suggestion:

"Tobacco Lords (if one must define the man at all) would be more acceptable in the historical context."

I conceed that, though technically it would only be truly valid if one were a member of the titled aristocracy. This was, afterall, the mid 1700's, and the old feudal titles still ment something. This made them a valuable commodity which could be purchased either from a hard-up aristocractic family or by greasing the right palms in court or parliament.
(As demonstrated in the novel and film Barry Lyndon)